Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • High-level Indicators
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission
Meetings
See next Council Meeting April 11 - 12, 2023 in (Webinar) › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
JUL 2022
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JUL 2022
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2022
WED
27
9:30 am—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy and System Analysis Committee Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
09
9:00 am—12:45 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2022
WED
10
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
AUG 2022
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
AUG 2022
TUE
30
9:00 am—11:00 am
F&W Committee Meeting
AUG 2022
WED
31
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
SEP 2022
MON
12
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2022
TUE
20
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2022
WED
21
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Tech Committee
SEP 2022
WED
28
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2022
THU
29
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
OCT 2022
TUE WED
04 - 05
F&W and Power Committee Meetings
OCT 2022
TUE
11
9:00 am—1:00 pm
Council Meeting
OCT 2022
TUE
18
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
02
9:30 am—12:00 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2022
THU
03
9:30 am—3:30 pm
GENESYS Technical Conference (SAAC/RAAC Combined)
NOV 2022
TUE
08
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Technical/Steering Comm Meetings
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
MON
05
1:30 pm—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
DEC 2022
TUE
06
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
WED
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
FEB 2023
WED
22
2:00 pm—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources/Demand Response Adv Comm Combined Meeting
FEB 2023
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
FRI
24
9:00 am—2:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Comm.
MAR 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2023
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2023
THU
23
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Technical Committee
MAR 2023
TUE
28
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
MAR 2023
FRI
31
9:00 am—10:30 am
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2023
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
APR 2023
MON
10
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
18 - 19
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
WED
24
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2023
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JUN 2023
WED THU
21 - 22
RTF Meeting June 21-22, 2023
JUL 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
AUG 2023
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
AUG 2023
TUE WED
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
FRI
15
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
19
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
OCT 2023
WED THU
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE
07
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
WED
08
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE
05
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Cost-Effectiveness Strategies for the Fish and Wildlife Program

Council Document Number: 
IEAB 2012-1
Published date: 
Feb. 20, 2012
Document state: 
Published

Share

The Northwest Power Act contains language promoting the cost-effectiveness of the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program (the Program). The Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB) assists the Council in its responsibilities with respect to cost-effectiveness. Perhaps the two most common questions the IEAB fields are “What has the Council done to ensure that the Program is cost-effective?” and “What else could be done to make the Program more cost-effective?” This paper attempts to address these questions.

Part I of this paper documents how changes in project management, scientific review, and planning have been used to promote scientific assessment and cost-effectiveness of the program. This section, written with Council staff, provides a historical perspective on the progress of the Program over time.

Following a 1996 amendment to the Act that strengthened cost-effectiveness considerations for the Program, the Council developed a paper that included four strategies for improving the cost- effectiveness of the Program. Those strategies are:

  • Ensure the biological effectiveness of Program measures
  • Increase the use of cost analysis in project selection and prioritization
  • Analyze project histories in more detail
  • Improve project contract management by the Bonneville Power Administration

There has been progress in each of these areas since the Council’s first Program. The Program includes a large science component whose main purpose is simply to ensure that projects have benefits for fish and wildlife. Increased focus on the science of fish and wildlife recovery actions was promoted even before the 1996 amendment to the Act with the formation of the Independent Science Group in 1995 and its predecessor groups dating back to the first Program in 1982. Their paper on “Return to the River” focused planning on ecological and biological foundations. Following the 1996 amendment, the Council created three independent scientific groups to help enhance the effectiveness of fish and wildlife projects. The Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) provides the Council with independent scientific review of fish and wildlife projects. The Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB) fosters a sound scientific approach to the recovery and research programs of NOAA Fisheries, the Council, and the Columbia River Tribes. The Council established the Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB) in November 1996 to advise the Council on cost-effectiveness and other economic issues associated with the Program.

The work of these boards has not only improved the biological effectiveness of projects, it has also contributed to improved project management and review and increased reporting, data availability, and cost review. Specific examples include development of project proposal forms that improve the amount and consistency of information provided, improved data and models to track and assess the status of fish and wildlife, and project management systems such as Bonneville’s Pisces and Taurus programs. A number of Bonneville and Council management initiatives have sought to document and control costs and compare projects in terms of their purposes and costs to avoid wasting Program, state, and federal funds.

In addition to progress on the individual project level, recommendations of the independent boards and Council actions have improved the overall effectiveness of the Fish and Wildlife Program. For example, the ISRP played an important role in developing improved proposal requirements, subbasin planning, and categorical reviews, all of which contribute to an improved Program. Four broad retrospective reviews of Bonneville funded projects were produced by the ISRP in 2005, 2007, 2008, and 2011 to help assess Program accomplishments and identify potential improvements. The Council has made gradual improvements to the Program in terms of more specific objectives, overall Program framework, rebuilding targets, implementation plans, and measurable performance standards. The Council is further refining the biological objectives of the Program. This initiative will play a key role in tracking the effectiveness of the Program and prioritizing actions to most cost-effectively reach its goals.

In summary, there is good reason to believe that the cost-effectiveness of the Program has improved greatly over the nearly 30 years since passage of the Northwest Power Act. For the most part, these improvements cannot be measured in monetary terms for each increment of improvement in fish and wildlife population or survival. Rather, the improvement has occurred incrementally over time and in ways that do not attract much recognition. The improvements result from improved scientific assurance of fish and wildlife enhancements, greater specificity of project goals, improved management of project costs, better reporting and data on projects, greater coordination among projects within subbasins, and more specific Program goals and tracking of accomplishments.

In spite of the many important improvements in management, science, and planning, the IEAB believes that further cost-effective improvements are possible. Part II of this paper discusses how additional effort, information, and analysis might be used to further improve the cost- effectiveness of the Program.

First, cost-effectiveness involves comparison of alternative ways of accomplishing a given goal. Past efforts at considering alternatives, and the future potential range and timing of alternatives, are not well-documented. Future efforts to consider alternatives and their costs would benefit from this documentation.

Opportunity for improved cost-effectiveness of the overall Fish and Wildlife Program can be identified through continued work to refine Program objectives to be comparable to measurable Program accomplishments. In addition, expanded analysis of groups of projects with similar geographic coverage, species focus, or other objectives can reduce overlap and redundancy among projects, identify opportunities for collaboration, and help set priorities within limited budgets to maximize benefits to fish and wildlife.

The greatest opportunity for analyzing and improving Program cost-effectiveness lies in improved quantification of fish and wildlife benefits. The limited ability to measure effects of actions on fish and wildlife health and abundance has hindered cost-effectiveness analysis. Thus, progress in identifying and quantifying biological benefits would greatly aid cost-effectiveness considerations in the Program.

A first step in improving the measurement of fish and wildlife benefits would be development of additional quantitative measures of improvements in fish and wildlife habitat benefits. Current examples of such measures include wildlife habitat units, mainstem passage measures, and use of tools like EDT (Ecosystem Diagnosis and Treatment) to estimate the benefits of physical improvements to habitat. Additional efforts are underway to address this need with quantitative estimates of survival effects of suites of actions under the biological opinion, and development of quantitative measures of survival benefit units in the estuary. If these efforts are successful in providing measures of benefits related to particular actions, the feasibility of more formal cost-effectiveness analysis will be enhanced.

Improved measurement of the biological effects of alternative actions, and their costs, would improve the ability to make cost-effectiveness comparisons. The IEAB recognizes that the measurement of the effects of actions on fish and wildlife is the province of biologists and the IEAB proposes to work more closely with the other independent science groups to identify how evolving measures of biological effects might be used to further advance Program cost-effectiveness.

Part II of the report also explains how comparisons of alternatives and their costs might be applied at various scopes; such as within projects, within subbasins, across subbasins, across species, and across jurisdictions. The first step in such analysis is to better understand the range and timing of discretion in Program spending alternatives. Improved information on alternatives, costs, and effectiveness could inform project proposals and facilitate prioritization within the Fish and Wildlife Program. However, the scope for trade-offs and prioritization within the Program is limited to some degree by treaties, ESA requirements, the fish and wildlife accords, and required Council deference to fish and wildlife agencies and tribes.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
IEABColumbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife ProgramCost Effectiveness Analysis

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media:

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2022

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions