Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations F&W Program Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission
Meetings
See next Council Meeting October 11 - 12, 2023 in Redmond › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
MON
05
1:30 pm—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
DEC 2022
TUE
06
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
WED
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
FEB 2023
WED
22
2:00 pm—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources/Demand Response Adv Comm Combined Meeting
FEB 2023
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
FRI
24
9:00 am—2:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Comm.
MAR 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2023
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2023
THU
23
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Technical Committee
MAR 2023
TUE
28
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
MAR 2023
FRI
31
9:00 am—10:30 am
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2023
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
APR 2023
MON
10
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
APR 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—12:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
MAY 2023
WED
24
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2023
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JUN 2023
WED
21
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Meeting June 21, 2023
JUL 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2023
FRI
14
9:00 am—12:30 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
JUL 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2023
THU
20
9:00 am—3:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
AUG 2023
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
05
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
SEP 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
FRI
15
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2023
THU
21
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting - Governors Report and Future Reporting
OCT 2023
WED THU
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE
24
9:00 am—12:30 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
OCT 2023
THU
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting - Flat Funding
NOV 2023
WED
01
9:30 am—4:00 pm
Reserves in Power Planning Workshop
NOV 2023
THU
02
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2023
TUE
07
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
WED
08
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE
05
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JAN 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
FEB 2024
TUE WED
06 - 07
Council Meeting
MAR 2024
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
APR 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
MAY 2024
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JUN 2024
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
AUG 2024
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
OCT 2024
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeteing
NOV 2024
WED THU
13 - 14
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Review of AFEP project - Statistical Design for the Lower Columbia River Acoustic-Tag Investigations of Dam Passage Survival and Associated Metrics

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 2009-43
Published date: 
Oct. 16, 2009
Document state: 
Published

Share

At the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Council's request, the Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) reviewed the document "Statistical Design for the Lower Columbia River Acoustic-Tag Investigations of Dam Passage Survival and Associated Metrics". This project is proposed for implementation through the Corps' Columbia River Fisheries Mitigation (CRFM) Program, specifically the Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program (AFEP). ISRP review of projects under this program was directed in 1998 by U.S. Congress Senate-House conference report for the fiscal year 1999 Energy and Water Development Appropriations bill. The ISRP's review responsibilities are also incorporated in the Council's 2009 Fish and Wildlife Program.

The Corps and staff from the Northwest Power and Conservation Council identified this proposal for ISRP review because the proposed survival model and experimental design will be used to measure dam passage survival in accordance with the 2008 NOAA Fisheries Biological Opinion Juvenile Salmon Dam Passage Performance Standards and to assure compliance with the Columbia Basin Fish Accords. The project's purpose is to develop a survival model and experimental design for estimating survival through the Lower Columbia River dams toward meeting the 2008 Biological Opinion performance standards. Further, this project represents the Corps' efforts to develop a standardized plan of study, intended to apply sound scientific principles to implementation of AFEP-funded survival studies. Moreover, although developed for simultaneous implementation at the three lower river projects, the basis for the design is not constrained to those projects.

The ISRP found the proposal meets scientific review criteria of sound science, benefits to fish and wildlife, clearly defined objectives and outcomes, and provisions for monitoring and evaluation of results. The ISRP review states that the proposal is a thoughtfully prepared plan to evaluate how well the structural and operations improvements mandated for the Lower Columbia River (John Day, The Dalles, and Bonneville) projects are meeting the 2008 FCRP BiOp and Columbia River Fish Accords survival targets for yearling and subyearling Chinook and Steelhead. The supporting material, providing details of the statistical design and analysis, is comprehensive and useful. The survival model is grounded in standard statistical methods and uses advances that have recently appeared in the literature. The authors have sought outside advice, have done preliminary experiments, have learned from those experiments, and have adjusted the protocols to reflect that experience.

The experimental design for this project is well reasoned, justified, and described. Procedures are given to assure quality control, to trouble-shoot problems that may occur with data collection, and to verify key assumptions. Experience to date with the juvenile salmon acoustic tagging system (JSATS) has been encouraging; nevertheless, the scale and complexity of the proposed project makes it probable that modification of the experimental design will be necessary during data collection.

The investigative team is relying on detection capabilities of fish implanted with JSATS rising to 90% or greater below Bonneville in this current year, and the sample sizes have been tentatively set on the basis of this assumption. There is also uncertainty concerning which of the detector arrays downstream of Bonneville will provide the best detection rates, and some trial and error evaluation will be necessary in an effort to "calibrate" the design. Detection rates reported in the statistical design, while much improved over those of previous years, are still in need of further improvements. The extra acoustic arrays that are planned should certainly improve the situation, but contingency planning for the case where detection rates remain 50%, or rise only to 60%, 70%, 80%, but not to 90%, would be wise. In the presence of reduced detection probability, the uncertainty of survival probability estimation increases, as do the sample sizes needed to counter the loss of statistical resolution.

The assumption runs throughout the proposal that "tagging effects" will be relatively small. There is literature showing that any handling of smolts, and implantation of acoustic tags in particular, can result in increased mortality. The project will assess departures from the assumption of "no tag effects," but assumes they will be small. Over the time frame necessary to migrate from the tailrace of McNary Dam to the Columbia River estuary, the cumulative effects of the acoustic tags may be larger than anticipated, perhaps large enough to obviate the advantages of the three-project design. As acoustic tags become smaller, carrying them should become less of a burden, but handling and implantation will remain issues. This may require modification of the experimental design after the initial results are evaluated. The plans for regularly evaluating model assumptions as the study progresses are essential.

The ISRP notes that there is legitimate debate about how to determine sample size. The important point is that it would be good to set the sample sizes large enough to be sure to detect differences from the BiOp survival rates with high probability. One should set the sample sizes large enough to ensure that large shortfalls are almost certainly detected and that smaller ones are detected with respectable probability. The ISRP believes an essential objective of this evaluation effort should be to estimate the true survival rates, whatever they are, rather than simply rejecting the null hypothesis of "no significant departure" from the BiOp standards.

In addition to addressing the BiOp standards, the proposal addresses other critically important issues. In particular, data about the specific routes juvenile salmon and steelhead take on their downstream migration will be collected, and the relative success rates from these different routes will be assessed. Such information makes it possible to parameterize the models required for making management decisions. Knowing how many fish take each route makes it possible to understand whether structural changes, such as modifications in the spillways and bypass systems, are improving fish survival, providing direction for changes that should be pursued or abandoned.

It is important that these data be preserved and made available at an accessible online site. In the long term, improvements in analysis of the data will come with improvements in physical filtering to separate noise from signal and in digital filtering to improve the sample size and to separate live fish from background noise. This will lead to a better understanding of fish behavior. In particular the 3-D data need to be protected to allow extracting information about routes fish take through projects. The COMPASS model was developed with the ability to take advantage of such data, and it is important that this ability be fully utilized in management experiments.

See the attached memo for the full technical review.

Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
Lower ColumbiaDam Passage SurvivalISRPAcoustic-Tag

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2023

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions