Contact
About

Integrating energy and the environment in the Columbia River Basin

About the Council
Mission and Strategy Members and Staff Bylaws Policies Careers / RFPs
News

See what the Council is up to.

Read the Latest News
Read All News Press Resources Newsletters International Columbia River

Explore News By Topic

Fish and Wildlife Planning Salmon and Steelhead Wildlife Energy Planning Energy Efficiency Demand Response
Fish and Wildlife

The Council works to protect and enhance fish and wildlife in the Columbia River Basin. Its Fish & Wildlife Program guides project funding by the Bonneville Power Administration.

Fish and Wildlife Overview

The Fish and Wildlife Program

2020 Addendum 2014/2020 Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Project Reviews and Recommendations F&W Program Costs Reports

Independent Review Groups

  • Independent Economic Analysis Board (IEAB)
  • Independent Scientific Advisory Board (ISAB)
  • Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP)

Forums and Workgroups

  • Asset Management Subcommittee
  • Ocean and Plume Science and Management Forum
  • Regional Coordination
  • Science and Policy Exchange
  • Toxics Workgroup
  • Columbia Basin Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Workgroup
  • Informal Hatchery Workgroup
  • Strategy Performance Indicator Workgroup

Topics

  • Adaptive Management
  • Anadromous Fish Mitigation
  • Blocked Areas
  • Invasive and Non-Native Species
  • Lamprey
  • Predation: Sea lions, pike, birds
  • Protected Areas
  • Research Plan
  • Resident Fish
  • Resource Tools and Maps
  • Sockeye
  • Sturgeon
  • Hatchery Map
Energy

The Council develops a plan, updated every five years, to ensure the region’s power supply and acquire cost-effective energy efficiency.

Energy Overview

The Northwest Power Plan

The 2021 Northwest Power Plan 2021 Plan Supporting Materials Planning Process and Past Power Plans

Technical Tools and Models

  • Regional Portfolio Model
  • Generation Evaluation System Model (GENESYS)

Energy Advisory Committees

  • Regional Technical Forum
  • Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
  • Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
  • Demand Response Advisory Committee
  • Generating Resources Advisory Committee
  • Fuels Advisory Committee
  • Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
  • System Analysis Advisory Committee
  • RTF Policy Advisory Committee
  • System Integration Forum

Energy Topics

  • Energy Efficiency
  • Demand Response
  • Power Supply
  • Resource Adequacy
  • Energy Storage
  • Hydropower
  • Transmission
Meetings
See next Council Meeting October 11 - 12, 2023 in Redmond › See all meetings ›

Recent and Upcoming Meetings

Swipe left or right
NOV 2022
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
NOV 2022
WED
30
9:00 am—10:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
DEC 2022
MON
05
1:30 pm—3:30 pm
Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee
DEC 2022
TUE
06
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2022
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
JAN 2023
WED
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
FEB 2023
WED
22
2:00 pm—3:30 pm
Conservation Resources/Demand Response Adv Comm Combined Meeting
FEB 2023
WED THU
22 - 23
RTF Meeting
FEB 2023
FRI
24
9:00 am—2:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Comm.
MAR 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
MAR 2023
TUE
21
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
MAR 2023
THU
23
9:00 am—12:00 pm
Resource Adequacy Adv Comm - Technical Committee
MAR 2023
TUE
28
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q1 Meeting
MAR 2023
FRI
31
9:00 am—10:30 am
Generating Resources Advisory Committee
APR 2023
WED
05
9:00 am—12:00 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
APR 2023
MON
10
1:00 pm—4:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
APR 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
APR 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—12:30 pm
RTF Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE WED
16 - 17
Council Meeting
MAY 2023
TUE
23
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
10:00 am—12:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting
MAY 2023
WED
24
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q2 Meeting
JUN 2023
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
JUN 2023
WED
21
9:00 am—12:00 pm
RTF Meeting June 21, 2023
JUL 2023
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2023
FRI
14
9:00 am—12:30 pm
Demand Forecast Advisory Committee
JUL 2023
TUE
18
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
JUL 2023
THU
20
9:00 am—3:00 pm
Conservation Resources Advisory Committee
AUG 2023
TUE WED
15 - 16
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
05
1:30 pm—4:30 pm
System Analysis Advisory Committee
SEP 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
SEP 2023
FRI
15
9:00 am—11:00 am
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q3 Meeting
SEP 2023
TUE
19
9:00 am—3:00 pm
RTF Meeting
SEP 2023
THU
21
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting - Governors Report and Future Reporting
OCT 2023
WED THU
11 - 12
Council Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE WED
17 - 18
RTF Meeting
OCT 2023
TUE
24
9:00 am—12:30 pm
Fuels Advisory Committee
OCT 2023
THU
26
1:00 pm—3:00 pm
Regional Coordination Forum (RCF) Meeting - Flat Funding
NOV 2023
WED
01
9:30 am—4:00 pm
Reserves in Power Planning Workshop
NOV 2023
THU
02
9:30 am—12:30 pm
Demand Response Advisory Committee
NOV 2023
TUE
07
9:00 am—1:00 pm
RTF Meeting
NOV 2023
WED
08
12:30 pm—3:30 pm
RTF Policy Advisory Committee Q4 Meeting
NOV 2023
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE
05
9:00 am—4:00 pm
RTF Meeting
DEC 2023
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
JAN 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
FEB 2024
TUE WED
06 - 07
Council Meeting
MAR 2024
TUE WED
12 - 13
Council Meeting
APR 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
MAY 2024
TUE WED
14 - 15
Council Meeting
JUN 2024
TUE WED
11 - 12
Council Meeting
JUL 2024
TUE WED
09 - 10
Council Meeting
AUG 2024
TUE WED
13 - 14
Council Meeting
SEP 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
OCT 2024
TUE WED
08 - 09
Council Meeteing
NOV 2024
WED THU
13 - 14
Council Meeting
DEC 2024
TUE WED
10 - 11
Council Meeting
View Council Meetings View All Meetings
Reports and Documents

Browse reports and documents relevant to the Council's work on fish and wildlife and energy planning, as well as administrative reports.

Browse Reports

REPORTS BY TOPIC

Power Plan Fish and Wildlife Program Subbasin Plans Financial Reports Independent Scientific Advisory Board Independent Scientific Review Panel Independent Economic Analysis Board

COLUMBIA RIVER HISTORY PROJECT

Step One Response Review of Snake River Basin Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning Facility Master Plan (Project #2007-401-00)

Council Document Number: 
ISRP 2016-12
Published date: 
Sept. 27, 2016
Document state: 
Published

Share

In response to the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s request of July 18, 2016, the Independent Scientific Review Panel (ISRP) reviewed a revised Snake River Basin Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning Facility Master Plan prepared by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC) and the Nez Perce Tribe (hereafter “project proponents”). In the preliminary review dated May 13, 2016, the ISRP found the original Master Plan to be well written, containing an excellent summary of the extensive steelhead reconditioning work that has occurred in the Basin, but needing clarification on nine issues (ISRP 2016-8). The project proponents revised the Master Plan and included an appendix in response to the ISRP’s preliminary review.

This evaluation is part of the Council’s Three Step Review Process for artificial production programs. The Master Plan is a component of Project #2007-401-00, Kelt Reconditioning and Reproductive Success Evaluation Research. The proponents are proposing to modify the Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery (NPTH) and install six 20-foot and four 15-foot circular tanks to support the long-term reconditioning of up to 750 Snake River Basin steelhead kelts. This infrastructure would support the annual release of 180 reconditioned kelts – “the equivalent of a 6% increase in B-run adult steelhead escapement relative to the base period considered in the Supplemental Comprehensive Analysis Steelhead Kelt Appendix (Bellerud et al. 2008).”

The proponents acknowledge that the submitted Master Plan does not yet have all the necessary components for a Step 1 review. It currently lacks a Hatchery Genetic Management Plan (HGMP), and work is needed on the program’s Research, Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Plan, Comprehensive Environmental Assessment, Value Engineering review, and final design. Before producing these elements of the Master Plan, the proponents requested that the ISRP determine if the program’s preferred location for a long-term reconditioning facility for Snake River B-run steelhead is appropriate. The ISRP agrees that the NPTH provides the best location, among those considered, for the proposed kelt reconditioning facility. The proponents now need to complete the components of their Master Plan that were delayed until this assessment was made.

ISRP Recommendation: Meets Scientific Review Criteria (Qualified)

The proponents provided good detailed responses to the issues that were raised in the last ISRP review. A lingering issue, however, is the possibility that B-run steelhead abundance might be constrained by density dependent factors during the spawner to smolt stage rather than by low numbers of spawning adults. Monitoring studies to assess density dependent effects will be challenging to implement because of the remote locations of some of the populations. Moreover, collecting biological information is difficult due to high flows and turbidity during the spring when adults are returning to spawn and smolts are emigrating. Even so, Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) researchers (Copeland et al. 2013) developed recruits per spawner (R/S) relationships in two Snake River steelhead streams (Fish Creek, 15 broodyears, Lochsa River, Clearwater subbasin; Rapid River, 4 broodyears, Little Salmon River, Salmon subbasin). In both cases, density-dependent effects were detected.

The proponents are convinced (the ISRP less so) that increasing adult escapement will augment B-run population abundance. They hypothesize that reconditioned kelts from their program will increase the abundance and productivity of B-run steelhead populations located above Lower Granite Dam (LGR). The ISRP acknowledges that even if density dependence is currently limiting abundance, ongoing habitat and fish passage restoration work may help alleviate some population bottlenecks and lead to increased productivity. Also, reconditioned adults are buffered from environmental conditions that affect survival rates in mainstem and ocean habitats. Thus, these fish may become an important conservation resource when the survival of maiden steelhead is impacted by poor marine and river conditions. The project also directly addresses the issue of declining iteroparity in Snake River steelhead. Additionally, it provides an opportunity to assess the viability of using reconditioned kelts in population recovery. Consequently, the program offers a “spread-the-risk” strategy that can provide potential benefits not possible through any other existing or proposed action. The Council may wish, however, to weigh these potential benefits against those that might be obtained by alternative actions which improve B-run steelhead survival in tributary and mainstem habitats.

Qualification - The ISRP recommends that the proponents address the following four issues during the next phase of project development:

  1. Of the proposed locations for the kelt reconditioning facility, the NPTH appears to be the best option. The existing HGMP and Environmental Assessment for the NPTH will need to be modified to account for the reconditioning program.
  2. A comprehensive M&E Plan with an adaptive management component is needed. The M&E plan should describe quantitative objectives, sampling designs, data collection, and an assessment methodology that will be used to evaluate density dependence in B-run steelhead populations.
  3. Biologically based escapement goals that consider density dependence should also be included in the M&E Plan. Such goals will help the proponents assess the contributions that reconditioned kelts are making toward B-run recovery on a population-specific basis.
  4. The M&E plan should also provide more information on the level of effort that will be expended on collecting natural origin B-run kelts and on how they will be identified. How, for example, will the inadvertent inclusion of unclipped B-run hatchery kelts in the program be avoided?
Topics: 
Fish and wildlife
Tags: 
SteelheadKeltSnake RiverISRP2007-401-00

ISRP 2021-05 LibbyMFWPfollow-up1June.pdf

Download the full report

Sign up for our newsletter

  •    

Contact

  • Central Office
  • Idaho Office
  • Montana Office
  • Oregon Office
  • Washington Office
  • Council Members

Social Media

Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Vimeo Flickr

Copyright 2023

Privacy policy Terms & Conditions